If we synthesize what Clayer said , will highlight some ideas that , in my opinion , being innovative and important for the general public .First , it is not a criminal Albanianism some heroes , but that his birth ( which starts with arberesh ) influenced many factors , besides the development of Hellenistic ( Greek nationalism ) , there were also other factors , such as the development of school , reading the press , Austro - Hungarian policies of Italy , but also (note ! ) policies in the Ottoman Empire since the 1860s the authorities decided to establish more schools and thus, the level of education among Muslim Albanians , but also others were developed, and the idea of nationalism gloriously or nation thus becomes more acceptable to young people going through school .Secondly , asking if it seems normal to require review of our history with the Empire , Clayer replied that " definitely seems normal " , and that the whole history of Albania should be reviewed , because until now this story has been more ideological and is written by not utilizing social science theory .Third , when asked about the role of Kamal Ismail , Clayer noted that this was an Ottoman statesman and Albanian nationalism , in the beginning , there were more goals Ottoman Albanian than he chose independence in a point where there was no other choice . Also shown Clayer " saved " in the award of merit for the establishment of the Albanian state only the " hero " . Noting that he has been in charge of the government for a short time ( and here she made a lapse , because of its Albanian said " some day " rather than " a short time " ) , emphasized the role Clayer International Commission , which has affected more than Kamal Ismail creating Albania also pointing out that he has only governed and around Vlora Vlora , Durres was after Esad Pasha, who could have been also a hero of independence for example. So its basically the idea was that there were many players at the time and that , among them , Austria- Hungary and Italy have perhaps played the most important role of all .
Fourth , the question of nationalism and its relationship with the state , Clayer said he has been and is one of the ways to mobilize people , but it is not sure if he makes better state building or those who use . For all according to its own society in the daily lives of the various dynamics that are not only national or state , but also transnational , even provincial , family etc. . So things ( even when it comes to historical studies ) should not be seen only through the prism of nationalism , as this is a very limited vision of the world .