
I have only seen a total support , total defense and rarely whenever it is criticized for anything . Also , I do not know that in these six - seven years that Berisha is in power , I have read or heard even a critique of Tufa or Mark ( the latter since becoming MP ) , so even if any aspect of the policy Berisha , his captor 's approach to other institutions ( see plenty of VAT) , to his projects to bring the hydro nuclear cement , so many broken promises , among which the one on the fight against corruption system ( or compensating him for former political prisoners , since this controversy started on this topic ) , to collaborations with anyone without principle yesterday accused of corruption , for Gërdec etc. . I note the criticism that I have made myself both parties , with which some of them may not agree , but I do not, indeed, that they have no critical thinking to the party leader and support . I'm fully convinced that by themselves or with their close friends have critical attitudes .
Also , it does not require that these criticisms to make of the positions of independent journalism , which can be even more severe denonciator even provocative . Rather , i think more moderate , positive and benevolent spirit , but with dignity and public intellectual who has no inferiority complex against the ruler of that is imposed by force of this argument . Unfortunately this does not happen with this category . Of course , the cause should first have to find political leaders who do not honepsin criticism , to build relations with the intellectuals in vertical reports superior - subordinate and not horizontal relations between equals .
Just on the eve of elections or exit this vertikalitet opposition tends to move . Then you can see politicians sitting in cafes , in conversation with intellectual equals , but when entering the office immediately alienated as they power . But , on the other hand , can not be missed that this category of intellectuals accept this alienation and assign the role that leaders in power too easily . Looks like fear of losing the love and trust of the leader or the group with which they are identified , and work together with the benefits or privileges , makes these flaws to remain silent to see the leader or the group that he leads. Thus , although perhaps are never sure until the end enjoy the trust and love, most have often look to put their intellectual ability to function opponent attacks by the fueling of conflict rather than destructive cold be critical voice dialogue builder .
Needless to say how useful it would be to own these leaders or parties themselves as intellectuals known as their supporters were kept at the right time critical one, two , three specific issues . Of course , they can also see themselves throwing off , or removed , or the situation of the unemployed . There are examples of this both parties . But , however , from what I know , even those (sadly few ) are not left without livelihoods and neither were put in jail as in the time of communism . In the dispute in question was written more for the responsibilities of intellectuals , their subjugation , serving the previous regime . But , let's not forget that at that time the possibility of choice , which is largely synonymous with freedom , and freedom , in turn , measuring the liability , there were many times smaller than today .